Target date funds (also known as lifecycle funds) have become increasingly popular in retirement plans. Close to 70% of 401(k) and profit sharing plans offered target date funds in 2014, according to the most recent survey by the Plan Sponsor Council of America.*
Are target date funds a good fit for your plan? What criteria are important when choosing to use them in a plan?
Understanding What They Are
Target date funds automatically rebalance their asset allocations and generally become more conservative as the target date gets closer. The change in asset allocation is referred to as the glide path. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has emphasized the need for plan sponsors to understand a fund’s glide path, which can be either “to retirement” or “through retirement.”
With “to retirement” target date funds, the equity portion of the fund’s asset allocation is reduced to its most conservative point at the target retirement date. “Through retirement” funds reach their most conservative asset allocation some years after the retirement target age.
Glide paths of funds with the same target dates may vary from fund to fund. For example, funds may differ in the percentage originally allocated to equity. They may also differ in when they start reducing their equity exposure and the rate at which it’s reduced. Another difference is that the asset allocation may follow an established glide path or be actively managed based on market conditions.
Underlying funds may be actively managed, passively managed, or a combination of both. Fees for active management are generally higher than for passive management, which is designed to track the performance of benchmark indices.
Guidance for Choosing Target Date Funds
In February 2013, the DOL’s Employee Benefits Security Administration issued guidance to employers and other fiduciaries of retirement plans for selecting and monitoring target date funds. The DOL emphasized that there are considerable differences among target date funds — even among those with the same target date. When selecting target date funds, the DOL suggests that plan fiduciaries take several steps. These include:
Know Your Plan Participants
Since different target date funds have different asset allocations over their glide paths, having an understanding of the demographics of your plan participants and their asset allocations may help you choose target date funds for your plan. This is especially important if you use target date funds as your plan’s qualified default investment alternative, as many plan sponsors do.
If your plan already has a target date fund option, it may be beneficial to review how participants are using the funds. Although target date funds are designed as a sole investment option, participants often invest in a target date fund and other options. Participants may also be invested in multiple target date funds. There may be a need to provide additional education to help participants better understand the target date concept.
Communication Is Critical
Providing information to your participants to clear up any misconceptions is vitally important to getting the maximum benefit of having target date funds in your plan. Points of emphasis can include that target date funds aren’t guaranteed against losses and that reaching a target date doesn’t necessarily mean that investors have saved enough to meet their retirement goals.
If you offer funds that don’t reach their most conservative allocation until after the target date, participants should understand the risks involved with having greater exposure to more volatile investments as they approach their retirement date and eventually retire. According to the DOL, such funds may be most appropriate for participants who expect to take their money out of the plan gradually after they retire rather than withdraw all their plan savings at retirement.
Having accurate expectations of target date funds should not only improve the participants’ investing experience but your overall plan experience as well.
* 58th Annual Survey of Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plans, Plan Sponsor Council of America, 2015
Comments are closed.