Stocks rebounded in March even as the Russia/Ukraine conflict continued to escalate. The key message from the Federal Reserve is that it is focused on fighting inflation and is prepared to hike short-term interest rates steadily and reduce its balance sheet until it reaches its goals. Q1 earnings season will kick off the week of April 11th and although Wall Street analysts have recently scaled back their expectations for quarterly earnings, they’ve been raising their forecasts for the rest of the year, according to FactSet. Earnings typically are the key engine of equity returns over the long run.
Here are 3 things you need to know:
Sources:
Disclosure: BFSG does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to BFSG’s website or blog or incorporated herein and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly. Please remember that different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy (including those undertaken or recommended by Company), will be profitable or equal any historical performance level(s). Please see important disclosure information here.
By: Thomas Steffanci, PhD, Senior Portfolio Manager
Is the real unemployment rate 2.3%? If you back out people who quit voluntarily to look for better paying jobs, the answer is yes. Quitters are still “employed”. They are in transition to other employment opportunities and should be considered as part of the labor force. If you adjust the current unemployment rate of 4.8% for the 2.5% “quit rate” (highest in 20 years) the “real” unemployment rate is 2.3%. This belies the Federal Reserve’s continuing easy monetary policy because of a weak labor market. If it is actually “tight” it adds to the case that inflation is likely to be more persistent and higher, prompting earlier increases in the Federal funds rate than the market now expects.
*Note – blog post corrected corrected 10/22/2021.
Disclosure: BFSG does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to BFSG’s web site or blog or incorporated herein and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly. Please see important disclosure information here.
It is readily apparent that the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) is more focused on employment rather than inflation. Last year the Fed released a new policy framework (1) that included a shift away from its traditional practice of raising interest rates based on the headline unemployment rate (U-3). It used to be that the market was trained to expect rate increases being triggered by the achievement of full or maximum employment, a level below which economists generally think inflation bubbles up in true Phillips Curve fashion. (2)
In Fed Chairman Jerome Powell’s appearance before the Senate Finance Committee last week he expanded on the Fed’s employment objective to what he called a “broad-based and inclusive goal,” where officials consider the unemployment rate of minorities as well as workers who are more marginally attached to the labor market. (3)
So, investors should no longer be focused on the “official” rate of unemployment, the U-3 rate. Instead, the Fed appears to be more concerned with the U-6 rate, which stands at 11.1% (versus a 6.2% U-3 rate). The African American unemployment rate, meanwhile, is 9.9%, while the Hispanic unemployment rate is 8.5%.(4) How the Fed is weighing these measures and where it wants them to be is unclear, as discussions have been qualitative not quantitative.
But it does dovetail with the Fed’s “patient” attitude towards inflation. The U-6 unemployment rate is historically “sticky” on the downside as skills training for marginal and disadvantaged workers takes time before meaningful employment occurs (see the chart above). It remains a huge policy question whether “structural” unemployment can be remedied by monetary policy. We have our doubts and keeps us very uneasy about the Fed’s response to cyclical inflation with their reaction function geared to the U-6.
Disclosure: BFSG does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to BFSG’s web site or blog or incorporated herein and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly. Please see important disclosure information here.